AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Checkout
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

 
AD2000 Home
Article Index
Bookstore
About AD2000
Subscribe
Links
Contact Us
 
 
 
Email Updates
Name:

Email:

Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!
 

Letters

Translations

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - Apr 2006AD2000 April 2006 - Buy a copy now
Editorial: New cardinals: Benedict XVI signals his intentions - Michael Gilchrist
Conscience: Dissenters' appeal to Rome 'a real hoot' says Cardinal Pell - Michael Gilchrist
News: The Church Around the World
Books: Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church
EarthSong: Green Christianity or a new paganism? - Michael Gilchrist
Salesian Missions: Cardinal Pell visits East Timor - Michael Lynch SDB
Creation: Intelligent Design and the war against God - Stephen Hitchings
The Domestic Church: The Christian Family Movement: re-evangelising through families - Leslie Sammut
Has just punishment had its day? - Fr Matthew Kirby
1973 Decree: A Fourth Rite of Reconciliation for Queensland? - AD2000
Music and Culture: Benedict XVI, Mozart and the quest for beauty - Mark Freer
Letters: Religious education - Saskia Ebejer
Letters: Action needed - Kevin McBride
Letters: New Age - Yana Di Pietro and Magenta Ray
Letters: Translations - George Simpson
Letters: National suicide - Greg O'Regan
Letters: Anti-life politicians - Robert Bom
Letters: RU486 - Brian Harris
Letters: Courageous example - Arnold Jago
Letters: Inclusive language - Ottavio Kos
Letters: Overseas priests - Peter Gilet
Letters: Leadership needed - Tom King
Letters: Church of England - Jim Turley
Letters: Religious life - Barbara Chigwidden
Books: Swear To God: The Promise and Powers of the Sacraments, by Scott Hahn - Jacinta Cummins (reviewer)
Books: Mother Angelica, by Raymond Arroyo - Stephen Hitchings (reviewer)
Books: Fr Martin D'Arcy: Philosopher of Christian Love, by H.J.A. Sire - Michael E. Daniel
Events: Holy Week 2006: Classical Roman Rite in Melbourne
Books: Stimulating reading from AD Books
Reflection: The redeeming Cross: at the centre of Christian faith - Cardinal George Pell

Several recent letters to AD2000 have rightly complained about the use of inclusive language in liturgies. Such use is an act of grave disobedience against clearly defined Church teaching.

In 1995 The Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith issued "Norms for Translation of Biblical Texts for use in the Liturgy". The matters therein do not merely apply to discipline but to revelation, and cannot, therefore, be changed by bishops or local bishops' conferences.

The instructions, inter alia, are as follows:

* The natural gender of personae in the Bible, including the human author of various texts where evident, must not be changed in so far as this is possible in the receptor language.

* The grammatical gender of God, pagan deities, and angels according to the original texts must not be changed in so far as this is possible in the receptor language.

* In fidelity to the inspired Word of God, the traditional biblical usage for naming the persons of the Trinity as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is to be retained.

* Similarly, in keeping with the Church's tradition, the feminine and neuter pronouns are not to be used to refer to the person of the Holy Spirit.

* There shall be no systematic substitution of the masculine pronoun or possessive adjective to refer to God in correspondence to the original text.

* Kinship terms that are clearly gender specific, as indicated by the context, should be respected in translation.

Unfortunately, the Canadian Lectionary predated the proclamation of the above. The Canadian Lectionary, however, probably departs from the Vatican II Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, which states:

22. (1) Regulation of the sacred liturgy depends solely on the authority of the Church, that is, on the Apostolic See, and, as laws may determine, on the bishop.

(2) In virtue of power conceded by law, the regulation of the liturgy within certain defined limits belongs also to various kinds of bishops' conferences, legitimately established, with competence in given territories.

(3) Therefore no other person, not even a priest, may add, remove, or change anything in the liturgy on his own authority.

I doubt that such an extreme revision fell within the scope of the certain defined limits mentioned in sub paragraph 2.

GEORGE SIMPSON
North Blackburn, Vic

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 19 No 3 (April 2006), p. 14

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004