AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

AD2000 Home
Article Index
About AD2000
Contact Us
Email Updates


Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!



Bookmark and Share

 Contents - Dec 2008AD2000 December 2008 - Buy a copy now
Editorial: Another Christmas and New Year edition - Michael Gilchrist
Novus Ordo: Vatican approves new Missal translation - Michael Gilchrist
News: The Church Around the World
Pub life: Young adult Catholic ministry: ingredients for success - Br Barry Coldrey
Bishops' Synod on Bible concludes: Pope working on Apostolic Exhortation - AD2000 Report
The decline of British Catholicism: the future? - John Haldane
Missions: Samoa's Don Bosco School gives students a 'second chance' - Br Michael Lynch SDB
FOUNDATIONS OF FAITH: Which Church did Jesus establish with his authority? - Frank Mobbs
'Catholic literature': what does this mean? - David Birch
Letters: Strange 'bedfellows' - J. Loring
Letters: Pro-Life - Chris Hilder
Letters: Evolution conference - Grahame Fallon
Letters: The Leonine Prayers - Kevin McManus
Books: The Life of Saint Joseph, by Maria Cecilia Baij, OSB - Tim Cannon (reviewer)
Books: Down in Adoration Falling, by Gareth Grainger - Br Christian Moe, FSC
Poetry: Genealogy - Bruce Dawe
Books: The Scope of Philosophy, by John Young - John Whitty (reviewer)
Schools: Blessed Mary MacKillop Colleges: 2009 enrolments (Jindera, Wagga Wagga)
Books: Books available now from AD2000 Books
Reflection: Benedict XVI's Christmas homily: how God became a child for us - Pope Benedict XVI

In my letter titled 'Sermons' (October AD2000) a seemingly innocuous change was made. I referred to a sermon on the 'anti-abortion message'. This became 'pro-life message'. Apart from historical accuracy, my wording was specific for a reason that is worth elucidating.

Secularists have used the tactic of moral equivalence to co-opt some in the Church into supporting their 'pro-life' agenda (i.e., gun control, abolition of the death penalty, and opposition to war). They have disguised their approach by using the slogan of consistency to garner support while, of course, never intending to be consistent and reciprocate in the pro-life areas of abortion and euthanasia.

The results are threefold. First, the aim of drawing Church members in is not just a numbers game of political persuasion, it is also to appropriate the Church's moral authority for their own agenda. This is an attempt to misuse the Church's moral authority. The Church's mandate is truth, not popularity, and this works both ways: just as the Church must proclaim what is intrinsically evil, it must also proclaim what is not intrinsically evil. This means that the Church does not have the right to make people feel guilty because they hold a legitimate moral point of view.

The second result that arises from using moral equivalence to blur the distinction between intrinsically evil acts (i.e., abortion and euthanasia) and acts that are not intrinsically evil (i.e., gun ownership, the death penalty for serious crimes and just war) is confusion, vagueness and an ultimate loss of focus in the Church's pro-life mission.

The real pro-life mission is to stop abortion and euthanasia. The secular world's tactic is an old one, it has adopted and hijacked the term 'pro-life' to suit its own agenda. In the process, an added benefit for it has been a loss of focus by the Church in prioritising and furthering its fight against abortion and euthanasia because it has been side-tracked into irrelevancies.

Third, the blurring of the distinction referred to above also leads to an insidious backwash, whereby relativistic and subjective notions are introduced and used to question the intrinsic evil of abortion and euthanasia. It works this way: because the majority of people recognise that gun ownership, the death penalty and war can be moral in some circumstances, a false consistency leads to questions over why cannot abortion and euthanasia also be justified in some circumstances?

As in all things, granting the premises of your enemy is the key to their victory; the rest is mere haggling over the consequences that the premises imply. In other words, any legitimisation of moral equivalence on secular 'pro-life' issues by the Church will corrupt its own pro-life stance. I suggest that the Church needs to clearly reject this moral equivalence under the guise of 'consistency'.

Queanbeyan, NSW

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 21 No 11 (December 2008 - January 2009), p. 14

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004