AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Checkout
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

 
AD2000 Home
Article Index
Bookstore
About AD2000
Subscribe
Links
Contact Us
 
 
 
Email Updates
Name:

Email:

Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!
 

Letters

Intelligent design?

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - Aug 2006AD2000 August 2006 - Buy a copy now
Editorial: Falling Mass attendances and liturgical reform - Michael Gilchrist
Liturgy: The new Missal translation: Archbishop Hart's progress report - Michael Gilchrist
News: The Church Around the World
Music: Benedict XVI seeks a greater sense of the sacred in church music
Canberra-Goulburn: Archbishop Coleridge: Benedict's first Australian appointment - Anh Nguyen
Priesthood: Promoting vocations in the Melbourne Archdiocese - Fr Anthony Denton
Victoria-Tasmania: Continued growth in vocations at Melbourne's Corpus Christi seminary - Joan Clements
Teen STAR: Sex education for young adults: a pro-life approach - Jacinta Cummins
Does Wollongong's Catholic Education Office endorse dissent? - AD2000 Report
What makes a Catholic university 'Catholic' - Father John Coughlin
Scripture and Tradition: sources of divine revelation - Fr G.H. Duggan SM
DIY Mass: Redemptionis Sacramentum revisited - Fr Martin Durham
Letters: Tasmania - Justin Kearney
Letters: East Timor contraception pressure - Imelda Aslett
Letters: Pregnancy Support - Robert Bom
Letters: What Is The Eucharist? - Rosanna Sherman
Letters: Intelligent design? - Peter Barnes
Letters: Funeral eulogies - Greg O'Regan
Letters: Receive EWTN around Sydney by satellite for $495 - Ernesta Sculli
Melbourne: Caroline Chisholm Catholic library - Barbara Shea
Books: In This Vale of Tears (Winterbine Trilogy), by Gerard Charles Wilson - Michael Gilchrist (reviewer)
Books: Land of Carmel, by Elizabeth Ruth Obbard - Jacinta Cummins (reviewer)
Books: SEEDS OF LIFE: Early Christian Martyrs - Julia Bakowski (reviewer)
Books: SNOW ON THE HEDGES: A Life of Cuthbert Mayne, by Helen Whelan - Michael E. Daniel (reviewer)
Books: Stimulating reading from Freedom Publishing
Reflection: The importance of early baptism - John Young

I am indebted to Father Duggan and Mr Griffiths for their comments on my letter.

I must first reiterate that I do not consider that in the evolution vs intelligent design debate, God's creation or sovereignty is in question.

In answering Mr Griffiths, irreducible complexity is a man-made concept. God's creation is indeed a mystery, but He need not have created according to our simplistic notions. Only now are we realising that there may be physical laws which actually mandate such construction, that for example, there are simple physical molecules which might, under extraordinary conditions, self-replicate into increasingly complex structures and feedback loops. What if the cell originated by the accretion and replication of such simple code bearing structures, so that what is complex, is not irreducible at all?

In answer to Fr Duggan, my reading of intelligent design means that there are certain macro (the human body) or microstructures (the cell) which are so irreducibly complex that they cannot be explained except by direct creation by the hand of God. Thus, intelligent design implies creationism, by excluding evolution.

I thank Fr Duggan for drawing attention to my criticism of the argument for cosmic intelligent design as allegedly developed by Aristotle and St Thomas Aquinas, and I find that this is indeed a common belief. My rereading - and that of others such as Armstrong - of Aristotle is that his notion was one of an immaterial but pantheistic prime mover far removed from cosmic design and creation.

As far as St Thomas is concerned, of the five ways, only the last could be interpreted as referring to design. But well-credentialled commentators such as Copleston SJ (arguably the greatest historian of philosophy) and Wippel do not see Thomas's fifth way (ST, SCG 1. c13) that way, as it seems to speak more to the providence of a final cause, than to cosmic design.

Indeed, Copleston in his Aquinas states that it would sit well with the hypothesis of evolution! At the very least, the argument from design is not heavily accentuated in Thomas, and it would appear that neither Aristotle nor St Thomas ever used the words intelligent design or cosmic designer. Intelligent design in particular is an entirely modern concept.

Since we will probably never know the mechanism of our origins, direct creation is clearly not untenable, but for modernity, the idea that evolution could have been the mode of God's creation makes perfect sense, and it is supported by a considerable body of evidence. However, intelligent design/creationism actually forbids God to create in certain ways which are offensive to some of His believers.

PETER BARNES
Bassendean, WA

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 19 No 7 (August 2006), p. 16

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004