AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

AD2000 Home
Article Index
About AD2000
Contact Us
Email Updates


Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!


Cart before horse

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - Oct 2011AD2000 October 2011 - Buy a copy now
Angelus Message: Our Lady of the Rosary (October 7) - Pope Benedict XVI
Episcopacy: Cardinal Pell: the responsibilities of Church leadership - Cardinal George Pell
World Youth Day 2011, Madrid: Australia's participation - Br Barry Coldrey
News: The Church Around the World
Pastoral care: One of the Catholic Church's best kept secrets - Marie Mason
Pro-life: Signs of hope from the United States - Babette Francis
Planetary spirituality: what next! - Frank Mobbs
History: Lepanto, history's most decisive naval battle - Bob Denahy
Catholic Schools: Saint Mary MacKillop Colleges, Wagga Wagga: progress report - Sr Mary Augustine OP
Letters: Anglican Ordinariate - Bishop Harry Entwhistle
Letters: World Youth Day - Arnold Jago
Letters: Bishop Morris - Michael Smith
Letters: One-sided - Charles M. Shann
Letters: Old or young earth? - Fr Brian Harrison OS
Letters: Cart before horse - John Young
Letters: Genesis debate - Anne Lastman
Letters: Pre-Vatican II - Kevin McManus
Letters: Same sex 'marriage' - Richard Congram
Letters: Invalid concept - Robert Prinzen-Wood
Letters: Sermons - Rev. Fr. J. Conway
Books: BENEDICT XVI: A Guide for the Perplexed, by Tracey Rowland - Michael Daniel (reviewer)
Books: ROME AND THE EASTERN CHURCHES: A Study in Schism (2nd ed), Aidan Nichols OP - Michael Daniel (reviewer)
Books: MEDJUGORJE REVISITED: 30 Years of Visions or Religious Fraud? - Michael Gilchrist (reviewer)
Donations: 2011 Fighting Fund contributions
Books: Order books from
Reflection: Benedict XVI's Final Mass homily for World Youth Day - Pope Benedict XVI

In his response to my article on Genesis Dr Frank Mobbs (September AD2000) has put the cart before the horse. He claims I gave a list of Church teachings that were adopted because they are in Genesis. But what I actually did was to interpret statements in Genesis in the light of Church teaching.

To take an example of this misunderstanding. Dr Mobbs says I see the following doctrine as resting on Genesis: "Satan tempted Adam and Eve". He responds: "Satan is not mentioned in Genesis. A snake is mentioned but he is not called Satan." I did not say the doctrine rests on Genesis; I interpreted the obscure text in Genesis in the light of the New Testament (Rev. 12:9), and of Tradition and the Magisterium.

I am rather intrigued by Dr Mobbs' claim that "If human evolution is true, then Genesis is false." Does he think Scripture teaches error? Or does he think we must reject human evolution as incompatible with the Word of God?

Father Brian Harrison OS, in this present issue of AD2000, points out that I omit the "non-evolutionary and directly supernatural formation of Eve from the side of Adam". I agree that Eve was in some way formed from Adam, but Ludwig Ott, quoting the words of St Paul, "The woman is of the man", notes that "the saying is and remains mysterious" ( Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, p. 95).

The suggestion has been made that Adam and Eve were identical twins, and God intervened at the chromosomal level to make Eve female. I've no wish to defend that speculation, but I wouldn't be prepared to say that official Catholic teaching completely rules out the origin of Eve by evolution.

On the question of macroevolution, however, strong scientific evidence exists against evolution, whether of man or animal life in general; evidence ignored by too many theologians and Scripture scholars. Father Harrison is to be commended for his work, over the years, in presenting the case against evolution.

A last point. Father Harrison thinks I am convinced that "the age of the earth is to be measured in billions, rather than thousands, of years." I was much more cautious than that! I merely said there is "scientific evidence that the universe is very old."

Melbourne, Vic

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 24 No 9 (October 2011), p. 14

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004