AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

AD2000 Home
Article Index
About AD2000
Contact Us
Email Updates


Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!


Religious liberty

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - Sep 2010AD2000 September 2010 - Buy a copy now
Appeal: 2010 Fighting Fund launched - Peter Westmore
Britain prepares for Benedict XVI's visit - Joanna Bogle
News: The Church Around the World
Academia: Challenging times for Catholic universities - Babette Francis
University: Another successful Australian Catholic Students Conference - Br Barry Coldrey
Ecclesial movements in the life of the Church - Bishop Julian Porteous
Cinema: The Waiting City - An Australian film of religious significance - M.A. Casey (reviewer)
Foundations of Faith: Do people of faith lack reason? - Frank Mobbs
Natural Family Planning: Kyrgyzstan leads the way - Paula Flynn
Vocations: The story of a grandmother and her love of the priesthood - Andrew Kania
Letters: New evangelisation - Retired Queensland Priest
Letters: Religious liberty - John Young
Letters: Infallible teaching - Fr Brian Harrison OS
Letters: A rejoinder to John Young - James Bogle
Books: Edith Stein Discovered / Edith Stein and Companions - Terri Kelleher (reviewer)
Books: LETTERS TO A NON-BELIEVER, by Thomas Crean - Michael Daniel (reviewer)
Books: MEETING JESUS AND FOLLOWING HIM: A Retreat, by Cardinal Francis Arinze - Br Barry Coldrey (reviewer)
Books: THE TEMPLARS: Knights of Christ, by Régine Pernoud - Br Barry Coldrey
Formation: MacKillop College: Wagga's educational showcase - Joanne Andrews
Books: Order books from
Reflection: Accepting the reality of sin: a cornerstone of Christian faith - Fr Dennis Byrnes

Dr Frank Mobbs (August AD2000) denies my claim in the July issue that Vatican II taught infallibly that people have a civil right to religious liberty. He argues that if the infallibility of the ordinary universal Magisterium were engaged here (as I argue) we would have to say that it was engaged in the past when the pope and bishops denied religious liberty. But contradictories can't both be true.

The first point I would make in answer to this is that Vatican II taught only a qualified right to religious liberty, saying that it applies "within due limits" ( Declaratio, on Religious Freedom, n. 2). The Council recognised that the common good can override the individual's right to propagate his opinions (Ibid, n. 7).

The historical instances Dr Mobbs gives are cases where it was judged by the Church authorities that the common good would be violated by the activities they proscribed. To determine whether the pope and bishops were right, all the relevant circumstances must be taken into account; but if they were wrong, or sometimes wrong, infallibility is not involved, for it was a matter of practical decisions, not the promulgation of doctrinal teachings.

Frank Mobbs opposes this solution by saying that "the pope and other prelates assumed to be true that the Church had a mandate to punish those opposing Catholic doctrine and practices".

In answer to this, firstly, Vatican II did not deny such a mandate in principle. Secondly, infallibility does not extend to what the pope and other prelates assume, but to what they teach definitively.

Further, the Church has always upheld the principle that the Faith must be freely accepted (see ibid., n. 10, with the historical references given there), even though in practice popes and bishops have acted inconsistently with this.

A final point. Dr Mobb's opening paragraph seriously misrepresents my position on the conditions required for a teaching to be infallible, as can be seen by referring to my article in the July issue (page 14, column 2).

Melbourne, Vic

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 23 No 8 (September 2010), p. 14

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004