AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Checkout
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

 
AD2000 Home
Article Index
Bookstore
About AD2000
Subscribe
Links
Contact Us
 
 
 
Email Updates
Name:

Email:

Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!
 

Letters

Doctrinal differences

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - May 2009AD2000 May 2009 - Buy a copy now
Editorial: The Virgin Mary's key role in our redemption - Michael Gilchrist
Dissent: Rebel South Brisbane priest: new cafeteria church launched - Michael Gilchrist
News: The Church Around the World
Inter-faith dialogue: Jewish leader defends Pope over Bishop Williamson controversy - AD2000 Report
Pro-family culture: AIDS in Africa: science vindicates Catholic Church - Babette Francis
US Catholics leaving the Church in droves: what can be done? - Fr Joseph A. Sirba
FOUNDATIONS OF FAITH: The Crusades: the truth behind the myths - Frank Mobbs
Conversion: A Catholic convert's story (Part 2): Are there any regrets? - Michael Daniel
Staying together: Stable families: the best defence against violence
Death of a Child: The Pot of Basil - Will Elsin
Poetry: Moments - Bruce Dawe
Letters: The Pope and AIDS - Arnold Jago
Letters: Fundamentals - J. Loring
Letters: Teilhard - Jeremias Wijeyeratne
Letters: Simple faith - Alan Barron
Letters: Doctrinal differences - John Morrissey
Letters: One Shepherd - Peter D. Howard
Letters: Women in the Church - Brian Bibby
Letters: From India - Fr A. Joseph PP
Books: Golden Years: Grounds for Hope: Fr Golden and the Newman Society 1950-1966 - David Kehoe (reviewer)
Books: Hilaire Belloc and G.K. Chesterton, by Karl Schmude - Br Christian Moe (reviewer)
Books: AD2000 Books for May
Reflection: 'What is truth?' (John 18:38) - The tunnel vision of Pontius Pilate - Andrew Kania

For all of his sincere spirit of ecumenism and Christian charity, Alan Barron's ideas on the sufficiency of love and the disastrous effects of the Council of Trent ('Church Unity', April AD2000) should not go unchallenged.

Even with the Bible on hand, if we do not know precisely what we believe, how are we to respond to challenges to our faith and practice with anything more than a crude fundamentalism or a mushy peace-and-love mantra, without any depth?

Alan says that 'what defines the congregation of the faithful is its ability to demonstrate love and unity, despite doctrinal differences'. This has already been attempted in Australia, with the merger of three major denominations some decades ago, which involved each jettisoning most of its distinctive doctrines - with disastrous effect.

What emerged was a generator for left-wing opinions and causes, with little religious identity, and empty pews except where the traditions of one of its constituent denominations remained dominant.

As for the Council of Trent being 'a disaster for church unity', it was the delay in facing the task of internal reform and tackling the religious confusion of the early 16th century with anything but anathemas that was the disaster.

Trent (1546-63) consolidated the teaching of the Catholic Church, so that only after its definitions would the faithful be able to verify whether a doctrine was orthodox or the product of some theological adventure.

Duffy's The Stripping of the Altars shows us that in England the common people only very gradually became aware that the changes of the Protestant Reformation were taking place; it was so often the familiar priest, in the familiar church at the familiar time. The Council of Trent drew the lines, and not before time. The Protestant Reformation had been given a 30 years start!

In our own time progressive Catholics might tell Alan that Vatican II had done away with Trent. Such people have never read the Council documents.

It is unfortunate that since Vatican II error has flourished in the pulpits, schools and convents, and much harm has been done by the failure of the Catholic Church to produce a catechism until 30 years after the conclusion of the Council.

With modern communications, which have been used as successfully by the progressives as Luther and others used printing, a catechism would have been timely in the 1970s, rather than in 1994.

No, Alan, love is not enough, for doctrinal differences must be recognised and their implications faced honestly and constructively.

JOHN MORRISSEY
Hawthorn, Vic

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 22 No 4 (May 2009), p. 15

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004