AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Checkout
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

 
AD2000 Home
Article Index
Bookstore
About AD2000
Subscribe
Links
Contact Us
 
 
 
Email Updates
Name:

Email:

Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!
 

Letters

Climate change

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - Aug 2008AD2000 August 2008 - Buy a copy now
Editorial: Humanae Vitae still a sign of contradiction - Michael Gilchrist (reviewer)
News: The Church Around the World
Priesthood: St Louis: another US vocations success story - AD2000 Report
Benedict XVI reaffirms Humanae Vitae on its 40th anniversary - Pope Benedict XVI
Holy Land: Middle East Christians face a precarious future - Robin Harris
Census shows a strong Church in Singapore - AD2000 Report
Foundations of Faith: How much history do the Scriptures contain? - Frank Mobbs
The tragic dilemmas of China's one-child policy - Babette Francis
Interview: Denise Mountenay on post-abortive women: from silence to lawsuits - Luke McCormack
Education: Progress continues with the new Wagga Wagga independent schools - Barbara Chigwidden
Letters: Climate change - Peter Finlayson
Letters: Infallible? - John Young
Letters: Timeless truths? - John Frey
Letters: Tradition - Anthony Bono
Letters: Lebanon - Richard Stokes
Letters: Body and soul - Elsie Cunningham
Letters: Human rights - Maureen Federico
DVD Review: APOCALYPSE? NO! Why global warming is not a crisis, by Christopher Monckton - Peter Finlayson (reviewer)
Books: MYSTERY OF CREATION by Paul Haffner - Michael Daniel (reviewer)
Books: QUESTION TIME by Fr John Flader - Fr Anthony Robbie (reviewer)
Books: Books available from AD2000 Books
Reflection: World Youth Day: bringing a message of hope to the secular culture - Fr Dennis Byrnes

If Dr Lloyd AM could include some evidence to support his (moral) rhetoric ('Climate concerns', July AD2000), he may have been able to indeed 'redress the balance'. Instead he seems intent on trying to persuade readers that because his 'detailed study of the science' conforms with 'scientific consensus' it is a call to concerted urgent drastic action.

As a highly qualified, professional scientist, he surely has an obligation to be more objective about issues than is evident in his letter.

I put it to Dr Lloyd that had his 'detailed studies' been more thorough he would have found out that the scientific consensus is very clear about its position, namely that there is a lack of scientific evidence to connect man-made greenhouse gas emissions with climate change.

This position was reiterated yet again at the International Conference on Climate Change held in New York in March 2008, where the 500 attendees included (climate) scientists, economists, planners and academics. Dr Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, an economist by profession, was particularly scathing of the 'climate alarmists' stating that he saw 'the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism.'

I suggest that Dr Lloyd's 'consensus' is a political consensus, achieved through a very systematic campaign, using fear of catastrophe as its principal weapon, targeting a largely gullible citizenry.

This has been driven by the Green lobby and its like-minded supporters with such success that it is now embedded in most Western governments and in the UN, as expressed through the IPCC. Consequently, the IPCC reports do not represent a scientific consensus. Sadly, the more objective scientists do not seem to 'market' their 'product' with the same zeal as the Green ideologues.

As a grandfather of 11, my concern is that, apart from being unnecessary, the 'urgent action' Dr Lloyd seeks to involve the reader in will not have one iota of impact on the two main carbon dioxide emitters, China and India.

More serious though, it will reduce the standard of living of affected citizens considerably by driving energy costs to treble current levels, thereby increasing the incidence of worldwide poverty, especially in the developing countries, all part of the Green agenda towards reducing the world's population to appease 'king environment'!

If Dr Lloyd is serious about undertaking 'detailed studies' of this issue, he could borrow my copy of the Christopher Monckton DVD reviewed separately in this issue of AD2000, which explicates the scientific consensus case very clearly, if only to demonstrate that Monckton at least is capable of objective analysis.

PETER FINLAYSON
Creswick, Vic

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 21 No 7 (August 2008), p. 15

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004